So when law enforcement base investigations off of "anonymous" informants / sources and they do nothing more than smear the good name of the #target and or, worse, like Nick Gillespie's outstanding courageously brave & honest reporting uncovers in his Reason Magazine (ReasonTV) piece = where an 80 year old man gets shot to death in the privacy of his own home by police who working hard to make a drug bust based on an "anonymous" informant who claimed they smelled drugs coming from the home (WTF?!) and somehow that was good enough for some doll to ruberstamp a search warrant which resulted in 0 drugs found and another innocent life ruined & wasted by the ever so epic failure that's now coming clear is the "holy war" for zealot "anti drug" law enforcement crusaders on its own citizens. All they need is a "suspicion."
Seriously?!
Reason is being suspicious of their tireless value(s) of suspicion.
So are there any consequences for misleading investigations that at the least smear the #target and waste tax payer money in doing so (it takes resources to relentlessly case someone looking for anything to upgrade a target to another "valued" level) and, then, worse #case scenario resulting in death(s) of a suspicious-less "priority" target?!
What?! Do you mean anonymous sources are not always accurate, truthful & can lead to wrongful investigations & even deaths?!..
"an anonymous informant, spearheaded the investigation." ...
@reason: Video: Police Shoot, Kill 80-Year-Old Man In His Own Bed, Don't Find the Drugs They Were Looking For - http://t.co/Xdsu0UP9xu
"an anonymous informant, spearheaded the investigation." ...
@reason: Video: Police Shoot, Kill 80-Year-Old Man In His Own Bed, Don't Find the Drugs They Were Looking For - http://t.co/Xdsu0UP9xu
No comments:
Post a Comment